H16 Discussion - Su24

PROBLEM STATEMENT

DISCUSSION THREAD

Hints:
Since this is a determinate beam, you are able to determine the reactions on the beam at B and C straight away from equilibrium considerations. It is recommended that you use the second-order approach for the integration process for finding rotations and displacements. For this, consider the two sections of the beam BC and CD.

  • Make a mathematical cut through the beam between B and C, and from equilibrium considerations, determine the bending moment M(x). Integrate once and twice to get the rotation θ(x) and displacement v(x):
    θ(x) = θ(0) + (1/EI) ∫M(x)dx
    v(x) = v(0) +  ∫θ(x)dx
    where θ(0) and v(0) are integration constants.
  • Make a mathematical cut through the beam between C and D, and from equilibrium considerations, determine the bending moment M(x). Integrate once and twice to get the rotation θ(x) and displacement v(x):
    θ(x) = θ(a) + (1/EI) ∫M(x)dx
    v(x) = v(a) +  ∫θ(x)dx
    where θ(a) and v(a) are integration constants. θ(a) and v(a) are found from the results of integrating from B to C.
  • Enforce the displacement boundary condition at x = a to determine the unknown integration constant.

Any questions? Ask (and answer) questions here.

2 thoughts on “H16 Discussion - Su24”

  1. Just to clarify, the problem is asking for theta(x) a points B and D? I am assuming deflection v(x) is "displacement" and theta(x) = dv/dx.

Leave a Reply