EXAM 1
Exam time/date/location:
Exam coverage:
Equation sheet
Exam 1 Solution
Sample exams:
Sample Exam questions - Fall 2014
Sample Exam questions - Fall 2015
Sample Exam questions - Fall 2016
Sample Exam questions - Fall 2017
Sample Exam questions - Spring 2014
Sample Exam questions - Spring 2015
Sample Exam questions - Spring 2016
Sample Exam questions - Spring 2017
Exam stats:
EXAM 2
Exam time/date/location:
Exam coverage:
Equation sheet
Exam 2 Solution
Sample exams:
ME 270 Exam 2 - F14 (V1) (Original + Final Answers)
ME 270 Exam 2 - Sp 14 (Original & Final Answers)
ME 270 Exam 2 - F15 (Original + Final Answers)
ME 270 Exam 2 - Sp 15 (Original + Final Answers)
ME 270 Exam 2 - F16 (Original+Final Answers)
ME 270 Exam 2 - Sp 16 (Original + Final Answers)
ME 270 Exam 2 - F17 (Original+Final Answers)
ME 270 Exam 2 - Sp 17 (Original + Final Answers)
ME 270 Exam 2 - Sp 18 (Original+Final Answers)
Exam stats:
On 1B for Spring 2018 Exam, why is the forces on AB and BC 100 and 15, and -100, -15. Wouldn't it be -100 for ABx and 100 for BCx
It is the force acting on the member at the point, not the force the member is exerting on the point.
For member BC, there needs to be a force in the direction opposite to the 200N force to keep it in equilibrium. So the force exerted on it, at point B is -100N.
In question 2B for spring 2018, shouldn't h decrease?
It is established in the first part of this question that h=3.81m.
When theta=0, for slipping and tilting to be true at the same time, sum of Moments = mg(1)-hP = 0, as well as sum of Forces in X = friction-P = (0.3)mg - P = 0.
That means P = 0.3mg
=> mg = 0.3mgh
=> 1=0.3h
=> h=3.33 < 3.81
Which means h should decrease, as opposed to the indicated increase in the answer key.
I also got the same answer as you. I am not sure why it would be increasing because indeed h=3.33 (when theta=0) < 3.81 (when theta=10). Have you gotten it confirmed by any professor if the answer is correct?
How was mg determined to be 100 for question 2B on spring 2018
I'm pretty sure it was not defined as 100, it was just left as mg. The answer for P is not in the answer key... but it is 0.122*mg
Can anyone explain how they got an answer for 2A on the SP18 final?
sum of Moments about A = (a+b)F-N+c(F_f) = 1.5F-N+0.1(mu)N = 1.5F-N+(0.1)(0.3)N = 0
=>1.5F = 1.03N
=>N = 1.456F
=>F_f = (mu)N = 0.436F
sum of Moments about B = r(F_f)-rW = 0
=>W = F_f
=>10 = 0.436F
=> F = 22.8N
In Question 3D of Spring 2018,
Is the maximum tensile stress 6400 because the normal stress at B is -6400, though I have seen nothing that substantiates this claim.
Or is there some other reason?
No, the reason depends on what your y value is when you use the (sig) = -My/I equation. For solving (sig)M, y is +1in while for solving (sig)max, y is -1 because the maximum tensile stress will be at the bottom of the cantilever beam. We also know this because the moment is positive at section B.
Sp16 4D, how do you know the location of x'?