Proposal Review Resources
Each proposal is reviewed in Curriculog by administrative and academic reviewers. The information below provides an overview of key questions units or committees look for when reviewing proposals.
Workflow Approver Resources
If you are set up as an approver in the workflow, resources are available to you via Purdue Box. Please
contact Kelly Lough at klough@purdue.edu for access.
If you need help navigating Curriculog, please contact curriculum@purdue.edu.
Proposal Review Prompts
The content below provides example questions that different approvers consider when reviewing proposals. Please consider these questions as you prepare your proposal.
Administrative Review (Curricula)
Unit | Reviewer Question (Curricula) | Proposals Reviewed |
---|---|---|
Bursar |
|
|
Financial Aid |
|
|
Financial Analysis and Planning |
|
|
Graduate Admissions |
|
|
Graduate Programs |
|
|
Graduate Records |
|
|
Higher Learning Commission |
|
|
Indiana Commission for Higher Education |
|
|
International Students and Scholars |
|
|
Purdue Online |
|
|
Registrar - PWL |
|
|
Administrative Review (Courses)
Level | Unit | Reviewer Question (Course) |
---|---|---|
All | Bursar |
|
Graduate Programs | Graduate Records |
|
All | Registrar - PWL |
|
Graduate Area Committee: New Programs (Degree, Major, or Certificate)
- The proposal demonstrates a clear need for the program (e.g., national, regional, state) and sufficient alignment with unit/college mission.
- The proposal demonstrates sufficient benefit to the targeted student audience (e.g., job opportunities, industry certification, licensure).
- The participating faculty have the appropriate academic rank to teach and supervise graduate students.
- The proposal includes clearly defined learning outcomes and student competencies aligned with the planned coursework.
- The proposal demonstrates sufficient quality and rigor for graduate-level programming.
Graduate Area Committee: New Course
- The proposal sufficiently describes how the course fits into their graduate program(s).
- There does not appear to be any overlap, in part or in whole, with Purdue campus courses and/or there is appropriate justification.
- The proposal outlines sufficient rigor for the proposed level (i.e., 50000 or 60000), including but not limited to:
- Specific course outcomes supporting the higher-order learning expected in graduate courses
- Alignment between course outcomes and assessment methods supporting the higher-order course outcomes
- Sufficient scholarly readings for graduate work
- Clear alignment of course outcomes to the detailed course outline OR week-by-week schedule
- Additionally, for 50000-level, Graduate Council policy requires four criteria:
- The use of primary literature in conjunction with advanced secondary sources (i.e., advanced textbooks)
- Assessments that demonstrate synthesis of concepts and ideas by students
- Demonstrations that topics are current
- Components that emphasize research approaches/methods or discovery efforts in the course content area (i.e., reading the research, critiquing articles, proposing research, performing research)